On 11/03/2020 Bank-A applied to repossess a property. A court hearing was scheduled for 14/04/2020. On 03/04/2020, Bank-A wrote a false statement. But COVID-19 adjourned the hearing and on 09/04/2020, just 6 days later Bank-A wrote to apologise and accept legal service. During lockdown proof was obtained that 5 weeks before Bank-A applied to the court they were escalating this borrower’s offer to settle their debt to the top of their organization, and looking to uphold their complaint for mis-selling.
A legal trail of hundreds of thousands of equity charges worth tens of billions were then found registered at HM Land Registry in the name of Bank-B. In 2008, all these charges were transferred to Bank-C, and again in 2010 to a third-party trust. But, without ever owning them, Bank-A fraudulently acquired the charges at HM Land Registry. But the low court made administrative, procedural, and even legal mistakes which prevented this case from reaching the High Court.
On 25/08/2023, a sitting judge in this case said evidence of this has merit. On 02/02/2024, Bank-C wrote that the charge was all paid off in 2010, but when they realised they gave proof of their fraud, their sudden reversal revealed all three trusted high street banks as contributors to the last financial crash.
Whistleblower
We have interviewed a whistleblower with more damaging evidence that 10.8 million equity charges have been wrongfully traded by abusing civil law this way in the United Kingdom.
Press packs
- A skeleton argument that invalidates £14 billion worth of UK charges, including this family’s counterclaim for potentially hundreds of millions. This press brief is the latest version of what was sent to Bank-A on 06/06/2023, which resulted in foul play as referred to in paragraph 81 of the skeleton argument.
- A case chronology of court orders and judges’ statements, which is a step-by-step guide to how civil law’s overriding objective is not-fit-for-purpose. This includes four years of court mistakes, wasted time and extra costs of this case.
- This is one of the first stories in which multiple Insolitus TV followers have connected for a joint claim.